Hamilton v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
147 F.3d 367 · 1998
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Shepherd v. International Paper Co. (2004), M. D. ex rel. Stukenberg v. Abbott (2018)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Catlin v. United States · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not expressly provide for motions for reconsideration, such a motion may be construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]he challenged order explicitly dissolved injunctive relief.... Accordingly, the order clearly is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McLaughlin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.