United States v. Hughey’s Empirical Analysis
147 F.3d 423 · 1998
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez (2006), United States v. Griffin (2003)
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 513
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Cronic · Ungar v. Sarafite · Wheat v. United States · Morris v. Slappy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme..., any person directly harmed by the defendant's criminal conduct in the course of the scheme.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Once we have determined that an award of restitution is permitted by the appropriate law, we review the propriety of a particular award for an abuse of discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]ny card, plate, code, account number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, personal identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier, or other means of account access that can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value, or that can be used to initiate a transfer of funds (other than a transfer originated solely by paper instrument).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.