Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.3d 589 - Nance v. Jd Vieregge

Nance v. Jd Vieregge’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.3d 589 · 1998

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara (2002), DeWalt v. Carter (2000)

37 federal appellate · 3 district ·

620199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Parratt v. Taylor · Heck v. Humphrey · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Hudson v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no relief could be granted 'under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Heck holds that a damages remedy that necessarily implies the invalidity of a criminal conviction ... is impermissible while that conviction stands. Nance pleaded guilty; his motion to withdraw the guilty plea was denied; and although the prison’s unconstitutional hindrance of his efforts to withdraw the plea (if that is what occurred) would be a good ground for a new hearing on the motion to set aside the plea, it would not establish that Nance is entitled to damages for the wrongful incarceration — not unless he went to trial and was acquitted, or the invalidity of his incarceration was established in some other fashion. The holding of Lewis that a claim based on deprivation of access to the courts requires proof of concrete injury, combined with the holding of Heck, means that a prisoner must have the judgment annulled before damages are available for wrongful imprisonment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]ivil rights complaints are not held to a higher standard than complaints in other civil litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.