Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.3d 64 - Genius v. Pepe

Genius v. Pepe’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.3d 64 · 1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2011

2 federal appellate · 8 district ·

90199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Watson v. Louisiana · Commonwealth v. McHoul · Commonwealth v. Gould · Solomon v. Kemp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even when ... the costs of an expert are borne by the state, pursuing any line of inquiry involves some use of time and distracts in some degree from other possible defenses that might be pursued. As the Eleventh Circuit has said, “counsel ... is not required to pursue every path until it bears fruit or until all available hope withers.” Solomon v. Kemp, 735 F.2d 395, 402 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.