147 F. App'x 755 - Thomas v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Bowen v. Yuckert · Williams v. Bowen · Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (citing 20 C.F.R. Subpart P, App. 1 § 12.00(B) ); Thomas v. Barnhart , 147 Fed. Appx. 755 , 759-60 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Berryhill“[t]he ALJ cannot reject [a medical provider's] opinion solely for the reason that it was based on [the claimant's] responses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Berryhill“a psychological opinion may rest either on observed signs and symptoms or on psychological tests”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.