Cliffs Synfuel Corp. v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 181 (Coal Market Competition Act of 2000) · 30 U.S.C. § 193 · 30 U.S.C. § 28 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co. · Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Krushnic · Gwillim v. Donnellan · Ickes v. VirGinia-Colorado Development Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ne can redeem a claim by resuming performance of the necessary labor or improvement to the claim before another person `relocates' the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“could only occur upon the simultaneity of the claim holder's failure to maintain and the subsequent relocation of the claim by a third person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the resumption doctrine was no longer applicable to oil shale claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.