147 F. Supp. 3d 868 - Ryan v. Microsoft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 16 (§ 5 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Bourjaily v. United States · Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]laintiffs have not shown that an exception to the statutes of limitations or tolling doctrine should apply”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.