Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Ga. App. 695 - Cross v. Cook

147 Ga. App. 695 - Cross v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Wong v. Bailey (1985), 193 Ga. App. 288 - Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. Perry (1989)

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

13019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morris v. State · Kapiloff v. Askin Stores Inc. · Herndon v. Herndon · Boswell v. Gillen · 137 Ga. App. 755 - Allen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. “The parties to a pending law suit may by oral agreement compromise and settle the same, which will bind them although not reduced to writing. Boswell v. Gillen, 131 Ga. 310 , 62 S.E. 187 .” Herndon v. Herndon, 227 Ga. 781, 783 , 183 S.E.2d 386, 388 (1971). For such an agreement to be binding on the parties it should be clear’that it is full and complete, covers all issues, and is understood by all litigants concerned. “A compromise, when made full and complete, puts an end to the subject matter of controversy.” Parker v. Riley, 21 Ga. 427 (1857), and see Kapiloff v. Askin Stores, Inc., 202 Ga. 292 , 42 S.E.2d 724 (1947). 2. An oral compromise, where denied by one of the parties, creates an issue of fact, and it will not be adopted by the court unless it appears that the terms were understood and agreed to by those concerned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.