Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Ill. App. 3d 638 - Ruggio v. Ditkowsky

147 Ill. App. 3d 638 - Ruggio v. Ditkowsky’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 167 Ill. App. 3d 772 - Lowe v. Kang (1988), 276 Ill. App. 3d 454 - Israel v. National Canada Corp. (1995)

4 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

2201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Ill. 2d 287 - People v. Murrell · 84 Ill. App. 3d 1132 - Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit Authority · 75 Ill. 2d 180 - People v. Johnson · 106 Ill. App. 3d 1046 - La Grange Metal Products v. Pettibone Mulliken Corp. · 64 Ill. App. 3d 603 - Laff v. John O. Butler Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In an action for common law contribution, the right to contribution arises due to the compulsory payment by a joint obligor of more than his share of a common obligation. [Citations.] Before one is entitled to contribution from his coobligor, the evidence must disclose that he has paid more than his just proportion of the joint indebtedness and it must also disclose what that excess is. [Citation.]””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right to contribution arises due to the compulsory payment by a joint obligor of more than his share of a common obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.