147 Ind. App. 246 - Wolf v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2004
2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farra v. Braman · 46 Wash. 2d 587 - United Benefit Life Insurance v. Price · Aetna Trust & Savings Co. v. Nackenhorst · 116 Ind. App. 404 - Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Bronson v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[UJnder the law of Indiana, the beneficiary-appellee had a mere expectancy of possibility. It was not until her former husband died, without changing the beneficiary, that her interest in, or right to, the proceeds of the policy became vested. Up until the time of his death the deceased, under the terms of the policy, could have terminated the mere expectancy of appellee. “Therefore, it is clear that the policy was the sole property of the deceased and during his lifetime he could name as beneficiary anyone he wished. The mere expectancy that arose because appellee was named as beneficiary was not a property right prior to the demise of the named insured. Only after the death of the named insured did her expectancy ripen into a vested right to the proceeds of the policy.” Wolf, supra, 147 Ind.App. at 250, 259 N.E.2d at 95.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“a mere expectancy or possibility and not a property right, interest, or title capable of being construed within the general term `personal property' as used in the settlement agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[where by the terms of the policy the right is reserved by the insured to change the beneficiary at will, then the original benefi-clary acquires only a defeasible vested interest in the policy, a mere expectancy, until after the death of the insured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.