Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 LA 900 - Jansen v. Bellamore

Jansen v. Bellamore’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1992

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

8019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grumley v. Webb · Lurie v. Pinanski · Fine v. Lawless · Cushing v. Danforth · Knapp v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule is not confined to any particular class of contracts or undertakings, but applies with equal force in every case where there exists a relationship of trust between the parties, requiring the exercise of mutual good faith and fair dealing, though it finds most frequent application among partners, attorneys and clients, tutors and wards, principals and agents, etc. . . "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . we hardly think, taking all of the circumstances of the case into consideration, that he would have refused it. He undoubtedly had the right to a fair opportunity to consider what action he would take, after a full and fair disclosure of the true circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““This rule of fair dealing was as effectually written into their agreement by the law as if it had been specifically stipulated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.