Gillespie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2008
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frisbie v. United States · Blum v. State · Lanasa v. State · Archer v. State · 5 H. & J. 317 - State v. Buchanan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an act is in its nature unlawful, knowledge of its wrongful character is presumed, and it is unnecessary to allege in an indictment that the defendants had knowledge of its wrongful character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Labella“as used in that definition, does not necessarily mean”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Labella
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.