Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

147 Mich. 591

Hayward v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1907

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1907-03-26

<p>Taxation — Tax Deeds — Cancellation.</p> <p>' There is no statutory impediment to cancellation by the auditor general of a tax deed or sale by the State after notice and the expiration of the period of six months referred to therein. Grant, J., dissenting.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1909

1 state decisions

Relies on Shaaf v. O'Connor · Jakobowski v. Auditor General

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1907-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hooker, J.

¶1I am of the opinion that there is no statutory impediment to cancellation by the auditor general of a deed or sale by the State after notice and the expiration of the period of six months referred to therein (see Jakobowski v. Auditor General, 144 Mich. 46; Shaaf v. O’Connor, 146 Mich. 504), and that relator’s laches, if the delay may be so called, under the circumstances, should not preclude the granting of his application to the auditor general.

¶2The writ should issue.

Me Alva y, C. J., and Carpenter, Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Moore, JJ., concurred with Hooker, J.
/147/mich/591 · .json · Public domain