Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

147 Misc. 563

Beekman v. Paskin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1933-05-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1938

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Since the assured’s employee was injured by a third person, the assured was under no common-law liability to provide him with medical treatment. Under section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law her duty to furnish such treatment terminated when the employee filed his notice of election to sue the third party. Under the terms of the policy the insurance company was under no liability to indemnify her for medical expenses which she voluntarily incurred thereafter.

¶2Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

¶3All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.

/147/misc/563 · .json · Public domain