Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 N.C. App. 94 - State v. Kincaid

147 N.C. App. 94 - State v. Kincaid’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

67 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brinegar v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause and requires a showing considerably less than preponderance of the evidence. Only some minimal level of objective justification is required. This Court has determined that the reasonable suspicion standard requires that [t]he stop ... be based on specific and articulable facts, as well as the rational inferences from those facts, as viewed through the eyes of a reasonable, cautious officer, guided by his experience and training. Moreover, [a] court must consider the totality of the circumstances — the whole picture in determining whether a reasonable suspicion exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order for [the law enforcement officer] to lawfully detain [the] defendant, [the officer]'s suspicion must be based solely on information obtained during the lawful detention of [the driver] up to the point that the purpose of the stop has been fulfilled. ... Since [the officer]'s continued detention of [the] defendant was unconstitutional, [the] defendant's consent to the search of his car was involuntary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the presence of more than one officer, the display of a weapon, physical touching by the officer, or his use of a commanding tone of voice indicating that compliance might be compelled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.