State v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Osie (Slip Opinion) (2014), State v. Lockhart (2010)
1 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Ball · Stephan v. State · State v. Scales · Mallott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to admit into evidence the taped recording of an interrogation, which occurs after Miranda rights are given, the recording must-be complete. The police need not tape the administration of a defendant’s Miranda rights or the defendant’s subsequent waiver of those rights. However, immediately following the valid waiver of a defendant’s Miranda rights, a tape recorded interrogation will not be admitted into evidence unless the statement is recorded-in its entirety.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dupont · State v. Ayer“the intentional touching of the victim's or actor's clothing covering the immediate area of the victim's or actor's sexual or intimate parts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pifer“[l]istening to a defendant be inculpated by his or her own voice has a persuasive power unrivaled by contradictory testimonial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.