Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 N.M. 209 - Keith v. MANORCARE, INC.

Keith v. MANORCARE, INC.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meiboom v. Watson · Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. · Clay v. Ferrellgas, Inc. · Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[tjhree elements must be addressed for a party to prevail under the doctrine of judicial estoppel. First, the party against whom the doctrine is to be used must have successfully assumed a position during the course of litigation. Second, that first position must be necessarily inconsistent with the position the party takes later in the proceedings. Finally, while not an absolute requirement, judicial estoppel will be especially applicable when the party’s change of position prejudices a party who had acquiesced in the former position.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.