Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 N.M. 45 - State v. RUDY B.

State v. RUDY B.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reflect[s] the rehabilitative purpose of the Delinquency Act, coupled with the realization that some juvenile offenders cannot be rehabilitated given the limited resources and jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Legislature has determined that serious youthful offenders cannot be rehabilitated using existing resources in the time available”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “are excluded from the jurisdiction of the children's court unless found guilty of a lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.