State v. Aragon’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]xperts and their opinions are not fungible when the testifying expert has not formed an independent conclusion from the underlying facts or data, but merely restates the hearsay opinion of a non-testifying expert.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[o]ut-of-court testimonial statements. . . unless the witness is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.