Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 N.M. 706 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · State v. Cunningham · State v. Apodaca · Santillanes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “How heavily the delay is to be weighed depends on the length of that delay and the amount of delay caused by a defendant in failing to timely respond to a plea offer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, we must give effect to that language and refrain from further statutory interpretation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “read Maddox to require the delay from plea negotiations to be weighed against the [s]tate when there exist measurable periods of negotiation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.