Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Ohio App. 3d 116 - State v. Cooper

147 Ohio App. 3d 116 - State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Cunningham (2017), State v. Young, Unpublished Decision (10-31-2005) (2005)

25 state decisions

110200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · State v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] trial court may require an indigent defendant to pay the cost of his court-appointed attorney only after the court makes an affirmative determination on the record in the form of a journal entry, that the defendant has, or reasonably may be expected to have, the means to pay all or some part of the cost of the legal services rendered to him.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] trier of fact may not draw an inference based entirely upon another inference, unsupported by any additional fact or another inference from other facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “if the person has, or reasonably may be expected to have, the means to meet some part of the cost of the services rendered to the person.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.