State v. Boland’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 136 Ohio App. 3d 355 - State v. Martin · 146 Ohio App. 3d 427 - State v. Anderson · 137 Ohio App. 3d 666 - State v. Hall · 127 Ohio App. 3d 32 - State v. Flahive · 133 Ohio App. 3d 578 - State v. Roth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The offender committed one or more of the multiple offenses while the offender was awaiting trial or sentencing, was under a sanction imposed pursuant to section 2929.16 , 2929.17 , or 2929.18 of the Revised Code, or was under post-release control for a prior offense. {¶ 12}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to apply to both public and private persons where that position is related to or facilitated the commission of the offense. State v. Boland, 147 Ohio App.3d 151 , 2002-Ohio-1163 , at ¶ 64-66 . In Boland, we found the offender was in a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(3) In committing the offense, the offender did not cause or expect to cause physical harm to any person or property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.