147 Ohio App. 3d 164 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2021
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“makes explicit the requirement that the foundation for the introduction of the statement under this exception must be made by testimony of the witness himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adbuleh“the child did not testify that the video tape correctly reflected the knowledge she had of the events in question at the time the video tape was made”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adbuleh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.