State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This statute (referring to section 7296, supra) presupposes .that at some time previous the claimant has sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment; an injury such as would bring the case within the provisiohs of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and which injury (if disability can be proven; would' warrant compensation at the hands of the Industrial Commission. However, unless an injury is held .to arise out of and in the course of the employment, it is not compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction to make an award thereon. Lucky Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial Com., 110 Okla. 27 , 236 Pac. 660 . In view of the holding of the Commission at the original hearing in this case that ‘the claimant did not sustain an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment,’ and that the same was noncompensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and under the authorities herein cited, if the claimant desired to have this court review' the decision of the Commission, he should have commenced his action within 30 days after May 2, 1928, -when the Commission made its order finding that claimant did not sustain an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with petitioner, and having failed to do so, this order of May 2, 1928, under section 7297, C. O. S. 1921, became final and conclusive between the parties, and the Industrial Commission was with”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Industrial Com.