Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 P.3d 1201 - State v. Gregory

State v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
6
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 127 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Yates (2007), State v. LORMOR (2010)

1 federal appellate · 127 state decisions

860200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Schmerber v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`so flagrant and ill-intentioned that it evinces an enduring and resulting prejudice'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[a]lthough relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “once a suspect's property is lawfully in the State's control, the State may perform forensic tests and use the resulting information to further unrelated criminal investigations, without violating the owner's Fourth Amendment rights”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.