Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 P3D 33 - Williams v. Kunau

Williams v. Kunau’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably People v. Tillery (2009), Watson v. Public Service Co. of Colorado (2008)

26 state decisions

140200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State · Stefanski v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the DIME process remains open and, when the treating physician makes a second finding of MMI, the employer or insurer may not file an FAL to close the case prior to returning the claimant to the independent medical examiner for a follow-up examination and determination of MMI.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.