147 So. 2d 25 - Holmes v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 102 So. 2d 259 - Sewell v. Sharp · Burge v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor · 128 So. 2d 915 - Jackson v. ADMINISTRATOR OF DIVISION OF EMPLOY. SEC. · 111 So. 2d 142 - Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Misconduct within the meaning of an unemployment compensation act excluding from its benefits an employee discharged for misconduct must be an act of wanton or wilful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ross v. Holiday Inn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.