Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 SO2D 365 - Lanier v. Tyson

Lanier v. Tyson’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2004

12 state decisions

7019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State of Florida v. Sullivan · In re Seizure of 7 Barrels of Wine · Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen · State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park · 62 So. 2d 5 - Henderson v. Antonacci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(3) All lands being used for agricultural purposes shall be assessed as agricultural lands upon an acreage basis, regardless of the fact that any or all of said lands are embraced in a plat of a subdivision or other real estate development. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We are aware of the decisions holding that classification of property for tax purposes does not offend against the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution . . . nor does it [subsection (11) of section 193.11, Florida Statutes] per se contravene the uniform and equal rate and just valuations of the Florida Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"In Florida, Article IX Section 1 [F.S.A.] of our Constitution requires a uniform and equal rate of taxation and further requires a just valuation of property. We will therefore attempt, with reference to these two requirements, to test the constitutionality of the construction given by the lower court to § 193.11(3)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.