147 So. 2d 80 - State v. Lumpkin’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Glassell · Jefferson v. Jefferson · State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Milam · State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ponder · State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hayward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"These witnesses, we conclude, were intimately qualified to appraise and evaluate the property herein involved and with which they were familiar. State Through Dept. of Highways v. Milam, La.App.2d Cir., 1961, 130 So.2d 145 . Moreover, these witnesses fulfill the particular requirement that appraisers, in such actions as this, be ` * * * familiar with land values in the vicinity of the property to be taken.' LSA-R.S. 48:443."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.