Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 SO3D 283 - Jackson v. Hicks

Jackson v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 595 So. 2d 624 - Lima v. Schmidt · 381 So. 2d 378 - Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · 939 So. 2d 1254 - Mallett v. McNeal · 806 So. 2d 950 - Crain v. Pletka · 753 So. 2d 968 - Foster v. Clarendon Nat. Ins.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “|SA tacit acknowledgment occurs when a debtor performs acts of reparation or ' indemnity, makes an unconditional offer or payment, or lulls the creditor into believing he will not contest liability. Conversely, mere settlement offers or conditional payments, humanitarian or charitable gestures, and recognition of disputed claims will not constitute acknowledgments .... Our courts have added,to the above generalizations other criteria that, evidence an acknowledgment,, including undisputed liability, repeated and open-ended reassurances of payment, and continuous and frequent contact with the creditor throughout the prescriptive period. Conversely, our courts have recognized that mere recognition of a disputed claim, conditional payments, and settlement or compromise offers or negotiations do not evidence an acknowledgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.