Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 SW3D 398 - Jenschke v. State

Jenschke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on California v. Greenwood · United States v. Wilkinson · United States v. Hedrick · Johnson v. State · Stone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a person who is not an officer or an agent of an officer takes property that is evidence of a crime, without the effective consent of the owner and with the intent to turn over the property to an officer the conduct may be non-crimi nal even though the person has intent to deprive the owner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case. In any case where the legal evidence raises an issue hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of the provisions of this Article, then and in such event, the jury shall disregard any such evidence so obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[e]vidence that a private person has obtained by committing [ e.g., ] a burglary is not to be admitted against an accused on the trial of a criminal case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.