Edwards v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State Farm Life Insurance Co v. Beaston (1995), Schiller v. Elick (1951)
6 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fickling Properties, Inc. v. Smith · Satterthwaite v. Loomis & McLachlen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The petitioners Edwards urge error in the form of the submission of Special Issue No. 6 by the trial court, but since the objection presented here was not raised by an exception to the court’s charge, as required by Rule 272, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the asserted error is deemed waived under Rule 274, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gale v. Spriggs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.