Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Tex. 315 - Ex Parte Henry

Ex Parte Henry’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 1993 · most notably Ex Parte Helms (1953), Deramus v. Thornton (1960)

43 state decisions

200194819501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Milk Wagon Drivers Union of Chicago Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies · Carlson v. People of State of California · Bakery Sales Drivers Local Union No. 33 v. Wagshal · American Federation of Labor v. Bain · Alliance Auto Service, Inc. v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the trial court ordered relators not to picket within 100 feet of the spur tracks when the railways were using or about to use them, he was abridging the right of free speech guaranteed them by the Constitution. So, in so far as the injunction judgment entered by the trial court attempted to restrain peaceful picketing at, near, across or within 100 feet of the railway tracks across Pickett Street, it is void____ [T]he order of commitment for contempt is likewise void. One cannot be punished for contempt for violating an order which a court has no authority to make. Id. 215 S.W.2d at 596-97 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Under our holding in Ex Parte Fisher, 146 Texas 328 , 206 S.W. 2d 1000 , we are authorized to consider the facts proved in the contempt hearing to determine whether they were sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the trial court to hold relators in contempt. That examination discloses that they were not so sufficient and that the contempt commitment was, therefore, void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “So long as the pickets did not physically obstruct the spur tracks and thereby nullify or seriously impair the right of the railways to use the street, they had the same right to use the streets as the railways had.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.