Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Tex. 332 - Adams v. Duncan

Adams v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably Benge v. Scharbauer (1953), Sharp v. Fowler (1952)

8 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

3401948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. Dickerson · Smith v. Allbright · Terry v. Terry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Since the Ford deed was not void, we think its effect is settled by Greene v. White, 137 Tex. 361, 153 S.W.2d 575, 136 A.L.R. 626. Although they did not sign the deed, grantees Adams accepted it and subsequently used it to their advantage ; so they and petitioners, their privies, were concluded by its recitals and by the reservations therein in favor of the Duncan estate and its heirs, the respondents. * * * 82 * * * * * * 83”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “four hundred eighty (480) acres of land [in Jasper County] out of a 640-acre survey patented to Wm. Duncan by the Republic of Texas, Feb. 26th, A.D. 1842, Abstract No. 136, Patent No. 173, Certificate No. 348, Vol. 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.