Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 TEX 571 - Paddock v. Siemoneit

Paddock v. Siemoneit’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Rodgers (1983), City of Rockwall v. Hughes (2008)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions

170194919501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Screws v. United States · Spies v. United States · Helvering v. Mitchell · United States v. Murdock · United States v. Illinois Central Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'except by abandonment or a voluntary conveyance'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Undoubtedly, as a director and the managing officer of the corporation, Siemo-neit occupied the position of a fiduciary toward the company .... Nevertheless, the texts cited point out that the officer and directors of corporations are not strictly trustees, and that their duties and liabilities are not necessarily identical with those of other fiduciaries. The character and consequences of the acts of an officer or director have apparently been determined on the basis of the facts of each case. Acts which might well be considered breaches of trust as to other fiduciaries have not always been so regarded in cases of corporate officers or directors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In determining the meaning of Federal laws, this Court is controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. * * * In this instance, however, there does not appear to be any decisions by the United States Supreme Court which is directly in point, and we have to try to arrive at the meaning of the statute from that Court’s opinions in more or less analogous cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.