147 Wash. 2d 141 - State v. Oster’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · State v. Smith · 42 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Emmanuel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoting State v. Jones, 101 Wash.2d 113, 120 , 677 P.2d 131 (1984)). CONCLUSION We conclude it is better practice to recognize a limited exception to the rule that all of the elements of the crime must appear in the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oster · State v. Davis“according to the decision you reach. In order to answer the question on the special verdict form”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oster · State v. Davis“[E]verything the jury was required to decide was clearly laid out for the jury to decide.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis · State v. Mills
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.