Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Wash. App. 276 - State v. Johnson

147 Wash. App. 276 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Draper v. Washington · Mayer v. City of Chicago · State v. Hoffman · 97 Wash. 2d 493 - State v. Grisby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he mere existence of antagonism between defenses `or the desire of one defendant to exculpate himself by inculpating a codefendant . . . is insufficient to [compel separate trials].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “For defenses to be irreconcilable, they must be `mutually exclusive to the extent that one [defense] must be believed if the other [defense] is disbelieved.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`antagonistic defenses conflicting to the point of being irreconcilable and mutually exclusive.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.