147 Wis. 2d 218 - State v. RAR’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Board of Pardons v. Allen · 105 Wis. 2d 171 - Mueller v. Brunn · 72 Wis. 2d 200 - State v. Rosen · 105 Wis. 2d 1 - Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult Education · 107 Wis. 2d 325 - State Ex Rel. Lockman v. Gerhardstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the time limit is mandatory, then the only effect is to deprive the court of its competency to hear the petition. If the court lacks that competency, then R.A.R.'s petition must be dismissed. If his petition is dismissed, R.A.R. remains committed to the department, and he must again petition for reexamination. But since he does not request that relief, dismissal of his petition, we need not grant it. Id. at 223.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the court shall within 24 hours of the filing order an examination to be completed within 7 days by the appropriate county department. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]f the court is satisfied that the defendant may be safely discharged or released without danger to himself or herself or to others. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.