Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 Wis. 2d 824 - State v. Jackson

147 Wis. 2d 824 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably 156 Wis. 2d 128 - State v. Richardson (1990), 218 Wis. 2d 180 - State v. Phillips (1998)

80 state decisions

5401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence · 98 Ill. App. 3d 663 - People v. Tribett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After having identified himself or herself as a law enforcement officer, a law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place for a reasonable period of time when the officer reasonably suspects that such person is committing, is about to commit or has committed a crime, and may demand the name and address of the person and an explanation of the person's conduct. Such detention and temporary questioning shall be conducted in the vicinity where the person was stopped.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer reasonably suspect in light of his or her training and experience?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t is a common sense question, which strikes a balance between the interests of society in solving crime and the members of that society to be free from unreasonable intrusions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.