¶1Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that it is apparent from the grossly excessive Verdict of the jury that the improper and inflammatory remarks and statements of plaintiff’s counsel, many of which wore without support in the evidence, were prejudicial to the rights of defendant and present reversible error. All concurredj except Kruse, J., who dissented.
148 A.D. 898
Wean v. Hayes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1911-12-15
Decided 1911-12-15