Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 BR 443 - In Re Antonelli

In Re Antonelli’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2013

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

130199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 365

Relies on Braniff Airways Inc Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Continental Air Lines Inc v. Braniff Airways Inc · In re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc. · Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. · Skeen v. Harms (In Re Harms) · Magness v. Dayton Country Club Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reorganization plan could not require that a law firm accept as a partner the assignee of one of their partners who had become bankrupt. The nature of the duties which law partners owe, not only to one another but to their clients, make their identities material to the very existence of the partnership.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the identity of the debtor is a material condition of the contract when considered in the context of the obligations which remain to be performed under the contract”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that require only routine management and leasing functions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.