In Re Burrell’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2010
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Canganelli v. Lake County Indiana Department of Public Welfare (In Re Canganelli) · Mulford v. Marshall (In Re Marshall)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute is clear that the date on which the six year period begins to run is the commencement date of the previous chapter 7 case.... The bankruptcy code and applicable case law is quite clear that the date of the original filing and not the date of conversion is the date which concludes the six year period barring a subsequent chapter 7 discharge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“% ifi * * * * the debtor has been granted a discharge under this section ... in a case commenced within six years before the date of the filing of the petition[.] (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hiatt“would undermine the integrity of the bankruptcy system”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.