Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 CALAPP2D 18 - People v. Strickland

People v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1964
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · People v. Holt · 30 Cal. 2d 676 - People v. Eggers · 44 Cal. 2d 252 - People v. Cavanaugh · People v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These are the facts and circumstances as shown by the record from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the crime was committed in Butte County: Sheriff Gillick of Butte County was called to the scene of the crime and apprehended the defendant within a short time after the shooting. Defendant was taken to the county jail by Deputy Sheriff Lucas of Butte County. It is presumed that these officers were performing their official duty within Butte County.” (See also People v. Mayfield, 196 Cal.App.2d 72, 74 [ 16 Cal.Rptr. 261 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.