Miller v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 185 Cal. App. 3d 1065 - Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986), Tulare County Department of Public Social Services v. Albert B. (1989)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794
Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 800 - Vasquez v. Superior Court · 67 Cal. 2d 695 - Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. · 12 Cal. 3d 447 - City of San Jose v. Superior Court · 67 Cal. 2d 733 - Morris v. Williams · 24 Cal. 3d 836 - California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““30-757 Program Content .1 Only those services specified below shall be authorized through IHSS. “.17 Protective supervision consisting of observing recipient behavior in order to safeguard the recipient against injury, hazard, or accident. “.171 This service is available for monitoring the behavior of non self-directing confused, mentally impaired, or mentally ill persons, with the following exceptions: “(a) Protective supervision does not include friendly visiting or other social activities. “(b) Supervision is not available when the need is caused by a medical condition and the form of the supervision required is medical. “(c) Supervision is not available in anticipation of a medical emergency. “(d) Supervision is not available to prevent or control anti-social or aggressive recipient behavior.” (MPP subd. 30-757.) A county’s determination of services to be provided is reviewable by hearing before the state Department at the recipient’s or provider’s request. (§ 10950.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to enable aged, blind or disabled poor to avoid institutionalization by remaining in their homes with proper supportive services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the class definition, (2) the size of the class and (3) the means of identifying class members.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.