Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Cal. App. 3d 906 - In Re Strick

148 Cal. App. 3d 906 - In Re Strick’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 54 Cal. 4th 314 - People v. Brown (2012), 157 Cal. App. 3d 832 - People v. Rosaia (1984)

32 state decisions

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Cannon v. United States · Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal · 15 Cal. 3d 328 - Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Glendale · 14 Cal. 3d 189 - People v. Romo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the requirement of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not apply if the remedy is inadequate. [Citation.] *Page 305 `[T]he doctrine . . . has not hardened into inflexible dogma. [Citation.] It contains its own exceptions, as when the subject matter of the controversy lies outside the administrative agency's jurisdiction [citation], when pursuit of an administrative remedy would result in irreparable harm [citations], when the administrative agency cannot grant an adequate remedy . . . and when the aggrieved party can positively state what the administrative agency's decision in his particular case would be. [Citations.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.