148 Cal. App. 4th 809 - Berg v. Traylor’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 3 Cal. 4th 1 - Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase · 21 Cal. 4th 383 - Norgart v. Upjohn Co. · 32 Cal. 4th 974 - Aguilar v. Lerner · 4 Cal. 3d 873 - Ballard v. Anderson · 26 Cal. 4th 42 - Styne v. Stevens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No specific language is required to communicate an intent to disaffirm. 'A contract (or conveyance) of a minor may be avoided by any act or declaration disclosing an unequivocal intent to repudiate its binding force and effect.' Express notice to the other party is unnecessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is the court's responsibility to protect the rights of a minor who is a litigant in court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.