Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

148 F. 1023

Simplex Electric Heating Co. v. Leonard

New York Southern District Court

Decided October 23, 1906.)

New York Southern District Court · decided 1906-10-23

<p>In Equity. On rehearing.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1910

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Simplex Electric Heating Co. v. Leonard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1906-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Equity. On rehearing.

¶2For original opinion, see 147 Fed. 744.

¶3Duncan & Duncan, for complainant.

¶4Kenyon & Kenyon, for defendants.

¶5PLATT, District Judge.

¶6I have examined this matter with some care, and can find no occasion for a rehearing. I think that all the demurrers were properly overruled. My memorandum was in no sense a “finding.” It gave some of the reasons (but by no means all of them) which forced me to my final conclusion. A further study emphasizes the correctness of that conclusion. 1 cannot see that the decision by Judge Wallace, referred to in the petition, ought in any sense to affect my action herein. Petition denied.

/148/f1d/1023 · .json · Public domain