Offner v. Chicago & E. R.’s Empirical Analysis
148 F. 201 · 1906
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson · Gold-Washing and Water Company v. Keyes · Kansas City Ft Co v. Daughtry · Louisville Co v. Wangelin · Plymouth Consolidated Gold Min Co v.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If such an averment is to be proven, it should be by circumstantial and detailed evidence, so that the court may judge whether the charge of bad faith in the averments for the purpose of evading the jurisdiction of the court is sustained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.