Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.1d 781 - Harrison v. Fite

Harrison v. Fite’s Empirical Analysis

148 F. 781 · 1906

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 8 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. (1940), United States v. Holt State Bank (1926)

27 federal appellate · 8 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states

130190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Niles v. Cedar Point Club · Hardin v. Shedd · Lamprey v. State · Howard v. Ingersoll · Morgan v. . King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It will be deemed navigable, when used or susceptible of use, in its ordinary condition, as a highway of trade and travel in the customary modes on water. * * * To meet the test * * * a water course should be susceptible of use for the purposes of commerce or possess a capacity for valuable floatage in the transportation to market of the products of the country through which it runs.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a theoretical or potential navigability or one that is temporary, precarious and unprofitable is not sufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.