Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.1d 792 - Smith v. Cascaden

Smith v. Cascaden’s Empirical Analysis

148 F. 792 · 1906

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 1956
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1956

3 federal appellate ·

20190619101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. · Davis v. Davis · Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co. · North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co. · Clarke v. Huber

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.